Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, like other politically correct, Muslim pandering leftists, is refusing to utter the simple words “radical Islam”.
Here’s her explanation.
Washington (CNN) Hillary Clinton explained on Sunday that she won’t use the term “radical Islam” because it “sounds like we are declaring war against a religion.”
“It doesn’t do justice to the vast number of Muslims in our country and around the world who are peaceful people,” Clinton said in an appearance on ABC’s “This Week.”
“No. 2, it helps to create this clash of civilizations that is actually a recruiting tool for ISIS and other radical jihadists who use this as a way of saying, ‘We are in a war against the West — you must join us,’” she said.
Clinton has faced criticism in recent weeks for — like President Barack Obama and other Democratic candidates — refusing to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism” in the wake of ISIS attacks like the shootings in Paris.
My question for the PC crowd — like Obama and Clinton — is how in the world we’re supposed to combat ISIS if we won’t acknowledge their religious beliefs as motivation for their attacks?
This isn’t simply a war of nations battling it out over who gets to own more real estate. Jihadists are at war with us because they believe its their religious duty to kill those who refuse to bow the knee to Islam.
How can we bring terror attacks to an end if we aren’t willing to address the ideals that spawn these groups to begin with?
Truth be told, they have no answer to this question, nor do they care. Liberals aren’t interested in keeping us safe, but in keeping power for themselves and winning elections.
Appealing to the brainwashed masses and making themselves look like heroes, rescuing Muslims from “persecution” helps sell the narrative and buy the vote.
Unfortunately, our security is the currency used in this exchange.